Abusing the T-word

As much as I hate talking about anything that has the word “twitter” in it, I just got a memo that today I should be begging my friends and fans to use and abuse the T-word and post the following (for real):

“#musicmonday This song by Lena is not half shabby http://bit.ly/Hm2KM!“ (or something along those lines).

Okay, I am begging as instructed. Now the ball is in your court.

Living together with another person serves a very useful purpose – it distracts one from the tragedy of being unfulfilled.

My classification of advertisements:

1) Ads made for peasants (“Local. Loyal. The way it should be”)

2) Ads made for peasants who want to feel and be perceived as “magazine cover” hip (very sensory ads for clubs, vodka, sunglasses etc)

3) Ads made for intelligentsia and the like (art and science related advertisements)

4) Ads made for peasants who want to feel and be perceived as “sophisticated” hip (promotions for alternative arts and artifacts of hipster culture)

5) Ads made for members of the upper society (a broad group of ads for various expensive things, experiences and systems).

There is a bit of a blur between the horizontals and the verticals of my classification (for example, there are ads for “new money” who want to feel and be perceived as “old money” etc). But that’s that – I am not going to spend more time on it.

Re: Mass. sues feds over definition of marriage

As I read about Mass. sueing feds over definition of marriage, I couldn’t help thinking about the lovely photoshop job of the famous Russian painting called “Unequal Marriage”.

Here is the original.

And here is “Equal marriage”: